I would like to build on some recent cases to perform a brief reflection on the rules and how sometimes their exploitation disrupts the way to become instruments of justice into their opposite.
Recently, is spreading among the Northern League mayors fashion to exclude from the school canteen children whose parents do not pay the monthly fee.
pay the fees of their children's school canteen is one of the duties of a responsible citizen, as you have to pay the train fare or the tax on rubbish. All true, the rules are important, indeed essential to organize the civil society. This thought Socrates, who violate the laws was tantamount to destroying the rules of human coexistence.
laws but are not designed to discriminate, but to put everyone on the same level of rights and duties. Do not pay for school meals for children because they spend the money on vacations and new cars, for example, is not the same as not paying because you do not have enough money and you are maybe out of work.
would therefore be useful to verify, first of all, the reason for non-payment, always acting to protect the right of minors who, lest we forget, are the first to suffer the consequences of this discrimination, the more odious because it clearly foreshadows the sake of mold racist.
An analysis of the nationalities of the families affected by the measure it turns out that the vast majority are not Italian, and then it seems clear the real purpose of the initiative, which aims to achieve with extreme cynicism in fact, some results, including not prevail it is certain that the economic contribution to the school canteen:
1. Engaging the support of public pro-follower of the new Northern League (aberrant) ideology that seeks to limit the scope of rights only for Italian citizens, in contrast, or, more likely, totally ignoring any reference to the Charter of Rights and to our Constitution;
2. you bet public attention on a lack (without going into the reasons) the negative magnifying scope in order to give a negative image of who is excluded;
3. the emphasis is so disproportionate that the exclusion seems to have done not only by the school canteen, but by the same company town, families "breach"
4. the bases to make scorched earth around the families whose parents are often used in work to black, or underpaid, and in this economic crisis are no longer needed in the same condition or better but if you are still not satisfied, if are willing to work longer hours, with less security, etc.
5. emphasizing the conflict between the poor creates the conditions for the workforce (both Italian and foreign) more at low prices;
6. phenomena will facilitate the expulsion of foreigners who, conscious of their economic importance to those areas, they begin to claim their rights as employees: one could speak of many Rosarno more "soft" to clubs where the crowd screaming and crawling, but not replace phenomena less effective than expulsion, pending the arrival of more foreigners, even illegal immigrants, more "domesticated" and certainly more than their blackmail now too "pretentious".
would be interesting to see just as much if the mayors have pursued the application of the laws on illegal labor and the exploitation of cheap labor that characterizes so much of our economy in all regions, from north to south.
should always observe the rules at all, or at least all those who believe that the law should not protect the rights of the most powerful at the expense of weaker ones. Using the law to discriminate, however, is the worst flaw of the social contract that binds citizens, a twist of the law that evokes the darkest period of the last century. Do not recognize the slippery slope that some administrators and politicians in general are taking, using people's fears to ride them for research purposes of electoral support, it could be the biggest mistake of all those who recognize themselves in a system of rules capable of defending democracy and the rule of law, then all of us .
Recently, is spreading among the Northern League mayors fashion to exclude from the school canteen children whose parents do not pay the monthly fee.
pay the fees of their children's school canteen is one of the duties of a responsible citizen, as you have to pay the train fare or the tax on rubbish. All true, the rules are important, indeed essential to organize the civil society. This thought Socrates, who violate the laws was tantamount to destroying the rules of human coexistence.
laws but are not designed to discriminate, but to put everyone on the same level of rights and duties. Do not pay for school meals for children because they spend the money on vacations and new cars, for example, is not the same as not paying because you do not have enough money and you are maybe out of work.
would therefore be useful to verify, first of all, the reason for non-payment, always acting to protect the right of minors who, lest we forget, are the first to suffer the consequences of this discrimination, the more odious because it clearly foreshadows the sake of mold racist.
An analysis of the nationalities of the families affected by the measure it turns out that the vast majority are not Italian, and then it seems clear the real purpose of the initiative, which aims to achieve with extreme cynicism in fact, some results, including not prevail it is certain that the economic contribution to the school canteen:
1. Engaging the support of public pro-follower of the new Northern League (aberrant) ideology that seeks to limit the scope of rights only for Italian citizens, in contrast, or, more likely, totally ignoring any reference to the Charter of Rights and to our Constitution;
2. you bet public attention on a lack (without going into the reasons) the negative magnifying scope in order to give a negative image of who is excluded;
3. the emphasis is so disproportionate that the exclusion seems to have done not only by the school canteen, but by the same company town, families "breach"
4. the bases to make scorched earth around the families whose parents are often used in work to black, or underpaid, and in this economic crisis are no longer needed in the same condition or better but if you are still not satisfied, if are willing to work longer hours, with less security, etc.
5. emphasizing the conflict between the poor creates the conditions for the workforce (both Italian and foreign) more at low prices;
6. phenomena will facilitate the expulsion of foreigners who, conscious of their economic importance to those areas, they begin to claim their rights as employees: one could speak of many Rosarno more "soft" to clubs where the crowd screaming and crawling, but not replace phenomena less effective than expulsion, pending the arrival of more foreigners, even illegal immigrants, more "domesticated" and certainly more than their blackmail now too "pretentious".
would be interesting to see just as much if the mayors have pursued the application of the laws on illegal labor and the exploitation of cheap labor that characterizes so much of our economy in all regions, from north to south.
should always observe the rules at all, or at least all those who believe that the law should not protect the rights of the most powerful at the expense of weaker ones. Using the law to discriminate, however, is the worst flaw of the social contract that binds citizens, a twist of the law that evokes the darkest period of the last century. Do not recognize the slippery slope that some administrators and politicians in general are taking, using people's fears to ride them for research purposes of electoral support, it could be the biggest mistake of all those who recognize themselves in a system of rules capable of defending democracy and the rule of law, then all of us .
0 comments:
Post a Comment