During the Provincial Council which was held yesterday, I explained the proposal of the PD-called "process immediately" that provides a fast track to the proceedings against the "senior" and parliamentarians. The majority currently ruling the country is ultimately very sensitive to what is called the process "short" or "right" to the issue of certainty of punishment as well as guarantees for the victims and defendants.
This is a shared purpose (even if today be faced with emergencies in the country are rather, in my opinion, those on the economic crisis and employment).
All citizens should be able to count on a quick and justice in certain times, and it is true that those who perform important public roles is particularly susceptible to the effects of high-profile announcements of judicial investigations, even when they later prove to be unfounded.
This is a problem that needs to be addressed in First by providing tools and resources appropriate to the machinery of justice.
Force at the time of the proceedings of the strict time limits, regardless of objective conditions in which the judges have to operate as it would require a doctor to treat pneumonia without antibiotics.
not only lengthen the time of healing rather than reduced, but much worse for the health of the patient.
of this argument, however, there has been talk about the process only when the issue concerned the so-called "senior" and, later, ladies and senators.
It is true, and roles of people are exposed to public view, and often simply because they have been subject to measures supervision has not panned damaged if the political and administrative activity.
Then why not write a fast lane and fast processes in which top officials and parliamentarians should be to be charged?
Pare the egg of Columbus: the suspect's interest to see now clarified its position, without having to give prior resignation. You could call it "process immediately."
It is not clear why the PDL has called a provocation by the PD this proposal in the House of Representatives as an amendment to the text on the "legal impediment" currently under discussion in the House.
The text should be more precisely in the direction often defended by the same PDL, aiming to reduce the time of justice and to shed light on possible charges against the politicians involved.
If the amendment is rejected on this occasion we in the PD as the re-bill or as stand-alone amendment to the law on "due process" for which the examination was postponed to late June.
PD I hope that this proposal will be considered because it is right that those who are touched by suspicion, especially if a public figure, may soon clarify its position and present a high forehead, if innocent, in the face of public opinion.
same time is right to know as soon as possible who are the people that govern us and minister to us, and the proposed PD also has this goal of transparency towards the citizens.
0 comments:
Post a Comment